Preview Project: Disparities in care for children hospitalized with bronchiolitis: A systematic review

Active

Systematic Review Information:

Study Goal

Our primary objective will be to determine whether variations in bronchiolitis managements, including use of low-value health services, are associated with patient and family characteristics (e.g., race and ethnicity, socioeconomic status, language). Our secondary objective will evaluate whether variations found in our primary objective, are in turn associated with disparities in care and outcomes, specifically examining length of hospital stay, intensive care unit admission, need for mechanical ventilation, and death.

Study Protocol

Description of PI and Investigative Team

Olivier Drouin MDCM, MSc, Université de Montréal; Patricia Li MDCM, MSc, McGill University; Sanjay Mahant MDCM, MSc, University of Toronto; Peter Gill MDCM, DPhil, MSC, University of Toronto; Tamara Perez, MSc, Hôpital Sainte-Justine; Philippe Dodin, MA, MSI, Hôpital Sainte-Justine; Remaining author list to be confirmed.

Offerings to Reviewers

  • Potential authorship
  • Letter of reference
  • Research Experience

Comments & Advice to Reviewers

Interested? You’ll start by completing a calibration set of 100 title and abstract reviews. Review the eligibility criteria carefully before screening. If you can definitively exclude an article based on the Title and Abstract, exclude it. Otherwise, it should be retained for full text review. Once you complete the test set, someone will be in touch with you for next steps.

How can you help

We’re looking for about 10 people to join our team. What's in it for you? Participation in an important review on overuse of low-value care services in children hospitalized with bronchiolitis – one of the most common causes of hospitalizations in children. And, of course, potential for authorship. Reviewers having fulfilled the following responsibilities will be offered the opportunity for authorship on the resulting publication: (i) Successful pre-screening of test set, 80% agreement, (ii) Review 800-1000 abstracts, (iii) Upload and review 50-100 full text articles, and (iv) Complete full text data extraction of 25-50 articles.

Contribute to Systematic Review

If the investigator has provided you with a "SECRET KEY" word, please use the Apply with Key button below. If you were not given a secret key word, please complete the test set using the "Apply to this project" button below. If you are not logged in, you will be brought to the insightScope Signup Page (The Test Set will only appear if the project creator has created one).